We are wrestling with the Ascension of Jesus, a much neglected doctrine of the Church. Yet it inspired the Apostles, was the foundation of their preaching and teaching, and as a result the early church had a dramatic, but in many ways inexplicable impact on the world. When this doctrine is denied or mis applied there are definite consequences.
With the rise of science, there was a trend in modern Biblical criticism and interpretation to deny that the Ascension was an actual event. These commentators deny the supernatural and hold the Acts’ account cannot be read literally nor has any value as history. They insist it must only be read symbolically or poetically.
John Stott in his commentary, The Message of Acts, presents the argument and conclusively refutes it.
- Acts was written during a pre-scientific era. The writer of Acts and the original audience believed heaven to be “up there.” So it was necessary for Jesus to lift off in order to get there.
- Science does not allow for this. Our modern cosmology does not place heaven up beyond the skies but in a different dimension.
- Luke is the only Gospel writer who has this story. The Ascension is best understood as an aspect or a version of the Resurrection.
- Once a reader accepts the possibility of the super-natural, the Resurrection/Ascension though unique events are possible. It is flawed thinking to say that since resurrection/ascension normally don’t happen that they could never happen.
- The Ascension is assumed throughout the New Testament although Luke is the only author who describes it. Peter’s sermon at Pentecost deals with the Ascension. Paul taught it (Ephesian 1:18-23, Philippians 2:9-11, 3:20, Colossians 3:1) . The author of Hebrews relied on it. (Hebrews 1:3, 4:14, 8:1)
- Luke stresses the eyewitnesses to the event. Five times in three verses Luke mentions the disciples saw it happen.
- The Ascension has a clear purpose: to signal the end of Jesus’ stay on earth.
In our next post we will talk about the Meaning of the Ascension.


